Students taught with the DIAPROVE methodology outperformed the ARDESOS-only group in deductive reasoning¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i1 Between-groups comparison showed a significant difference only in deductive reasoning (F=4.339, p=.039, Eta2 partial .026), favouring group 2 (M=4.53) over group 1 (M=3.08). → Carlos Saiz 2016

Evidence¶

Carlos Saiz 2016¶

Carlos Saiz, Silvia F. Rivas. (2016). New Teaching Techniques to Improve Critical Thinking. The Diaprove Methodology. Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 40.1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1166695

q2 · i1 · causal · r?

Between-groups ANOVA row from Table 4 comparing the DIAPROVE group (group 2) with the ARDESOS-only group (group 1) on deductive reasoning. The quote names both groups and their means, with the printed effect size Eta2 partial = .026, a small effect.

"Deductive Reasoning G.1. 3.08 (s.d. 1.33) G.2. 4.53 (s.d. 1.47) Group 1/Group 2 1;164 20.696 4.339 .039* .544 .026"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Both instruction groups improved significantly in deductive, inductive and practical reasoning and in decision-making after the ARDESOS-based intervention — related
• The group-by-time interaction was significant only for inductive reasoning, where the DIAPROVE group improved more than the ARDESOS-only group — related
• The ARDESOS-DIAPROVE intervention significantly improved critical thinking skills, with higher PENCRISAL medians after intervention in the total score and all five factors — related
• The ARDESOS program produced a significant pre-post improvement in overall critical thinking scores — related