Claims

Students who only kept learning diaries showed a decrease in their motivation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Diary-only students' motivation decreased over the course of the study. → Fabriz 2014

Evidence

Fabriz 2014

Fabriz, S., Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Poarch, G., Büttner, G. (2014). Fostering self-monitoring of university students by means of a standardized learning journal—a longitudinal study with process analyses. Eur J Psychol Educ, 29, 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0196-z

q2 · i? · causal · r1

In the same four-course comparison with pre–post measures, the diary-only condition showed a decline in motivation; the article states these students "even showed a decrease in their motivation." No effect size or test statistic is printed in the available text.

"Those students who only kept learning diaries even showed a decrease in their motivation."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id diary-only-motivation-decrease
title Students who only kept learning diaries showed a decrease in their motivation
description Students who only kept learning diaries showed a decrease in their motivation
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2014
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — fabriz-2014

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.