DIF analysis finds mostly negligible or slight-to-moderate differential item functioning, with only one item showing moderate-to-large DIF favoring Asian over White participants¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across seven demographic group comparisons, only the item "I follow coders on social media" exhibited moderate to large DIF (C+), indicating Asian participants were more likely to endorse it than White participants with similar coding career intentions. → Kao 2023
Evidence¶
Kao 2023¶
Kao, Y., Murphy, D., Hubbard Cheuoua, A., Kannan, P., Tsan, J., Jennings, K. E., Smith, H., Emanuel, S., & Miller, E. R. (2023). Survey development for assessing student computing career intentions: Technical report. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED638631
q2 · i? · design · r3
DIF analyses using the standardization method with ETS classification compared seven reference/focal demographic groups in the field-test sample. The article reports one C+ item and several B-category items; no effect size is printed.
"Although several items show slight to moderate DIF (i.e., B+/−), the item “I follow coders on social media” was the only one to exhibit moderate to large DIF (i.e., C+). The C+ ETS categorization indicates that Asian participants were more likely to follow coders on social media than were their White counterparts with similar coding career intentions."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- DIF analyses indicate the vast majority of MAP Growth items show negligible differential item functioning across gender and racial/ethnic groups — a broader claim this one bears on
- Cultivate survey items function without systematic bias across student groups by race/ethnicity, gender, economic disadvantage, learning differences, or EL status — a broader claim this one bears on
- Most Spanish test items show negligible differential item functioning across gender and Hispanic–White comparisons — a broader claim this one bears on
- DIF study finds most items in category A, with C DIF rare (~1%) except for the Native English/Bilingual group (6.66%) — a broader claim this one bears on
- The overall CT–PCK Survey functioned similarly across teacher characteristic groups, though some items showed raw differential item functioning above 0.64 logits — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dif-one-item-moderate-large-rest-negligible |
title |
DIF analysis finds mostly negligible or slight-to-moderate differential item functioning, with only one item showing moderate-to-large DIF favoring Asian over White participants |
description |
DIF analysis finds mostly negligible or slight-to-moderate differential item functioning, with only one item showing moderate-to-large DIF favoring Asian over White participants |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
recheck_by |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kao-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.