Claims

The differentiation approach significantly increased mathematics achievement of gifted students compared with the Ministry of National Education curriculum.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Gifted 5th-grade students in a private school taught with the differentiation approach scored significantly higher on overall, current, and enriched objectives than gifted students taught with the Ministry of National Education curriculum. → Altintas 2015

Evidence

Altintas 2015

Altintas, E., & Ozdemir, A. S. (2015). Evaluating a Newly Developed Differentiation Approach in Terms of Student Achievement and Teachers' Opinions. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.4.2540

q2 · i? · causal · r1

A quasi-experimental comparison with gifted 5th graders in a private school (n = 27) on Tables and Graphics content. After implementation, the differentiation-approach group outperformed the national-curriculum group on all three objective types, with the article reporting "a significant difference ... that favored the experimental group". No effect size was reported.

"However, after implementation, there was a significant difference between the students' overall (U = 5.50, p = .00 < .05), current (U = .00, p = .00 < .05), and enriched (U = 38.50, p = .01 < .05) objective achievement test scores that favored the experimental group."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.