Claims

The author proposes that students in flipped classes perceive less learning because they experience difficulty during class-time problem solving, whereas lecture students perceive understanding while following lectures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Students judge their learning by how much they feel they understand in class; flipped students recall in-class difficulty on problem work, so they report lower learning despite achieving more. → Jenna Van Sickle 2016

Evidence

Jenna Van Sickle 2016

Jenna Van Sickle. (2016). Discrepancies between Student Perception and Achievement of Learning Outcomes in a Flipped Classroom. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 16, No. 2, April 2016, pp. 29-38. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i2.19216

q1 · i? · causal · r1

The author's interpretive explanation (not a tested result) for the perception-achievement discrepancy: lecture students "feel they understood because they understood the lectures," while flipped students experience problem-solving difficulty in class and recall it at evaluation time. The article offers this as reasoning drawn from prior research, not as a measured finding.

"Looking back at the class, they remember the difficulty they had during class, and they do not feel they understood because they did not understand all of the problems."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.