Claims

Digital competence development is the most frequently reported advantage (76.1%) of digitally supported teacher education strategies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Digital competence development was the most frequently reported primary advantage in the RQ1/RQ2 subset (n = 118; 76.1%), including gains in technological knowledge, pedagogical integration and digital confidence. → Patiño Hernández JF 2026

Evidence

Patiño Hernández JF 2026

Patiño Hernández JF, Chiappe A and Ortega González E (2026). From digital competence to AI-responsive pedagogy: a scoping review of technology-supported teacher education. Front. Educ. 11:1949296. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1949296

q2 · i? · review · r2

Descriptive frequency analysis of primary advantages across the RQ1/RQ2 subset (N = 155). The quote shows digital competence development at "n = 118; 76.1%", with flexibility/access second at 8.4% and pedagogical innovation at 5.2%. The review interprets the distribution descriptively, not as evidence of relative effectiveness.

"Digital competence development was by far the most frequently reported advantage (n = 118; 76.1%), followed by flexibility, access and continuity (n = 13; 8.4%), pedagogical innovation and redesign (n = 8; 5.2%)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id digital-competence-development-most-frequent-advantage
title Digital competence development is the most frequently reported advantage (76.1%) of digitally supported teacher education strategies
description Digital competence development is the most frequently reported advantage (76.1%) of digitally supported teacher education strategies
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — patiño-hernández-jf-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.