Claims

Digital use intensity attenuates the positive EF–reappraisal association, more pronouncedly on the EF→ER pathway than the reverse

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3 · i1–i2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Digital use intensity significantly moderated the EF-to-reappraisal association (β = −0.14, p = .005); simple slopes were β = 0.56 at low use, β = 0.42 at average, and β = 0.28 at high use. → Shi Guochun 2026 q3 i? The reverse-pathway moderation (Reappraisal × Digital use → EF) was smaller and only marginally significant (β = −0.09, p = .050), and the suppression-side moderation was non-significant (β = 0.06, p = .197). → Shi Guochun 2026 (2)

Evidence

Shi Guochun 2026

Shi Guochun, Shi Zimo, Wang Qianqian. (2026). Cross-sectional bidirectional associations between executive function and emotion regulation in adolescents: the moderating role of digital engagement intensity. BMC Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05038-8

q3 · i2 · associational · r?

SEM with symmetric interaction terms in the 368-adolescent sample; the EF × Digital use interaction was β = −0.14, p = .005. Simple slope analysis showed the EF–reappraisal slope "attenuated—though still significant—at high levels (β = 0.28, p = .003)".

"the relationship between EF and cognitive reappraisal was strong at low digital use levels (β = 0.56, p < .001), moderate at average levels (β = 0.42, p < .001), but attenuated—though still significant—at high levels (β = 0.28, p = .003)"

Shi Guochun 2026 (2)

Shi Guochun, Shi Zimo, Wang Qianqian. (2026). Cross-sectional bidirectional associations between executive function and emotion regulation in adolescents: the moderating role of digital engagement intensity. BMC Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05038-8

q3 · i1 · associational · r2

Same symmetric SEM. The reverse-pathway interaction was only marginally significant and the suppression-side term non-significant, so the article reports the attenuation as "somewhat more pronounced for the EF → reappraisal association than for the reverse pathway".

"The corresponding moderation on the reverse pathway (Reappraisal × Digital use → EF) reached a smaller magnitude and only marginal significance (β = −0.09, p = .050), and the parallel suppression × digital use → EF term was not significant (β = 0.06, p = .197)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id digital-intensity-attenuates-ef-reappraisal-link
title Digital use intensity attenuates the positive EF–reappraisal association, more pronouncedly on the EF→ER pathway than the reverse
description Digital use intensity attenuates the positive EF–reappraisal association, more pronouncedly on the EF→ER pathway than the reverse
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — shi-guochun-2026, shi-guochun-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.