Digital writing workshop participation improved the 6+1 analytic writing dimensions of ideas, organisation, word choice, sentence fluency and spelling¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Writing quality improved on the named 6+1 dimensions for the experimental group. → Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol 2020
Evidence¶
Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol 2020¶
Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol. (2020). Effect of Digital Writing Workshop Activities on Writing Motivation and Development of Story Writing Skills. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.248.20
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Stories were scored on the 6+1 Analytic Writing and Evaluation Scale (maximum 35) by two researchers; Table 4 shows experimental posttest means of 27.2 versus control 18.2, and the conclusion states the named dimensions "had all improved".
"In terms of the students’ writing quality, it was revealed that ideas, organisation, word selection, sentence fluency and spelling had all improved."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Writing Skills — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Peer response groups increase the number of idea units in English learners' writing but show no significant effect on composition quality or sentences written (Prater & Bermudez, 1993) — related
- Students in the digital writing workshop significantly increased their use of story elements in their stories — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.