Contrary to expectations, the digital writing workshop significantly decreased fourth-graders' writing motivation while control-group motivation did not change¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The group-by-measurement interaction for writing motivation was significant. → Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol 2020
q3 i? Experimental-group motivation declined significantly from pretest to posttest; the control group showed no significant change. → Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol 2020¶
Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol. (2020). Effect of Digital Writing Workshop Activities on Writing Motivation and Development of Story Writing Skills. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.248.20
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Two-factor ANOVA for repeated measures on Motivation to Write Scale scores; the interaction was significant, F(1-28)= 5.90, p <0.05, while the group and measurement main effects were not significant.
"when the table is examined with regard to the joint effect of the scale time (pretest-posttest) and group (experimental and control) variables, a statistically significant difference was found between writing motivation scores"
Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol 2020 (2)¶
Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol. (2020). Effect of Digital Writing Workshop Activities on Writing Motivation and Development of Story Writing Skills. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.248.20
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Dependent-groups t-tests: experimental motivation fell from 56.53 to 53.13, t (14)=2.75; p=.01; the control group showed no significant change, t (14)=.-55; p=.59.
"As can be seen in Table 10, a statistically significant difference was found between pretest and posttest scores in the experimental group (t (14)=2.75; p=.01). However, this difference is due to the fact that writing motivation scores in the experimental group decreased."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Self-efficacy and performance goal motivation did not change significantly in any of the three groups — related
- In the private-school experimental group only test anxiety changed significantly from pre-test to post-test, decreasing; pre-post differences on the other motivation dimensions were not statistically significant — related
- A 14-week digital writing workshop produced significantly greater story-writing gains than regular curriculum lessons in fourth-grade students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.