A meta-analysis of 55 studies found Kohlberg's dilemma discussion approach had a moderate to significant effect on moral education, and Just Community Schools provided a moral culture¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Kohlberg's dilemma discussion approach had a moderate to significant effect on moral education according to a meta-analysis of 55 studies by Schlafli, Rest, and Thomas. → Xiangdong Liu 2014
Evidence¶
Xiangdong Liu 2014¶
Xiangdong Liu. (2014). The Problem of Character Education and Kohlberg's Moral Education: Critique from Dewey's Moral Deliberation. Philosophical Studies in Education 45. https://www.ovpes.org/
q2 · i? · theoretical · r2
Review-reported finding: the article cites, in the Kohlberg section, a meta-analysis of 55 studies by Schlafli, Rest, and Thomas finding dilemma discussion had "a moderate to significant effect on moral education." No effect size is printed; the reviewed studies' designs are not described here.
"In a meta-analysis of 55 studies conducted by Schlafli, Rest, and Thomas, the researchers found that Kohlberg’s dilemma discussion approach had a moderate to significant effect on moral education."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Discussion promotes more active thinking than lecture, though lecture is no worse for transmitting information — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Character education is criticized for didacticism and de-emphasizing reflection and moral judgment, and Dewey's deliberation is proposed as a bridge between it and Kohlberg's approach — related
- Dewey rejects Kohlberg's fixed stage hierarchy: moral inquiry happens only in problematic situations where no single action seems morally justified, and must be repeated as concrete situations arise — related
- The relational taxonomy is argued to support values and moral education because fostering ego strength addresses the gap between moral reasoning and moral behavior — related
- For Dewey, moral knowledge is a product of moral inquiry, so character education should add moral problem solving rather than teach fixed principles through example, reward, or punishment — related
- Dewey holds that virtues cannot be given fixed meanings because they express interests in changing objects and institutions, so virtues should be taught in relation to specific situations — related
- Dewey grounds morality in everyday problems, making administrative practice chiefly an ethical undertaking resolved by reflective appraisal of competing values — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dilemma-discussion-meta-analysis-moderate-effect |
title |
A meta-analysis of 55 studies found Kohlberg's dilemma discussion approach had a moderate to significant effect on moral education, and Just Community Schools provided a moral culture |
description |
A meta-analysis of 55 studies found Kohlberg's dilemma discussion approach had a moderate to significant effect on moral education, and Just Community Schools provided a moral culture |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — xiangdong-liu-2014 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.