The three pattern types differed significantly on behavioural codes (Type 1 > Type 2 > Type 3 for concept mapping) and on several interactive, cognitive and regulative codes, but not on socio-emotional codes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and cross-checking Kruskal-Wallis tests found significant differences (p < .05) on Int-B, KS, KM, TU, RM, CM, and OB, with CM ordered Type 1 > Type 2 > Type 3, but no significant differences on any socio-emotional code. → Fan Ouyang 2023
Evidence¶
Fan Ouyang 2023¶
Fan Ouyang, Weiqi Xu, Mutlu Cukurova. (2023). An artificial intelligence-driven learning analytics method to examine the collaborative problem-solving process from the complex adaptive systems perspective. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn (2023) 18:39–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09387-z
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Frequencies of five-dimensional codes compared across 24 CPS activities (n = 5, 14, 5 for Types 1–3); CM means were 160.80 (Type 1), 97.36 (Type 2), 42.20 (Type 3), with significant ANOVA results on Int-B, KS, KM, TU, RM, CM, and OB. "there were statistically significant differences between the three types along the behavioural dimension".
"there were significant differences in the frequency of Int-B, KS, KM, TU, RM, CM, and OB (p < .05) with a Bonferroni correction using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Specifically, there were statistically significant differences between the three types along the behavioural dimension (RM, CM, OB)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Emotional Intelligence — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Online concept-mapping behaviour may play a critical role in transforming verbal-discourse knowledge into deep-level co-construction; Type 3's lowest behavioural knowledge construction accompanied its lowest performance — related
- Exploration behavior is associated with the most complex and most varied conceptual models, with statistically significant differences across behavior types — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dimension-frequency-differences-pattern-types |
title |
The three pattern types differed significantly on behavioural codes (Type 1 > Type 2 > Type 3 for concept mapping) and on several interactive, cognitive and regulative codes, but not on socio-emotional codes |
description |
The three pattern types differed significantly on behavioural codes (Type 1 > Type 2 > Type 3 for concept mapping) and on several interactive, cognitive and regulative codes, but not on socio-emotional codes |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — fan-ouyang-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.