Claims

Teachers' direct instructional support is associated with students' use of self-regulation strategies, while autonomy as indirect activation was negatively associated with reading performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Kistner et al. found teachers' direct instructional support strongly associated with students' use of self-regulation strategies. → Charlotte Dignath & Marcel V. J. Veenman 2021 q2 i? The same study found indirect activation of SRL, measured as degree of autonomy, negatively associated with students' reading performance. → Charlotte Dignath & Marcel V. J. Veenman 2021 (2)

Evidence

Charlotte Dignath & Marcel V. J. Veenman 2021

Charlotte Dignath & Marcel V. J. Veenman. (2021). The Role of Direct Strategy Instruction and Indirect Activation of Self-Regulated Learning—Evidence from Classroom Observation Studies. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0

q2 · i? · review · r2

Observation study using the ATES instrument examining teachers' direct and indirect promotion of SRL in relation to teachers' pedagogical beliefs. The review reports that "Teachers' direct instructional support was strongly associated with students' use of self-regulation strategies"; the study lacked student achievement data.

"Teachers' direct instructional support was strongly associated with students' use of self-regulation strategies."

Charlotte Dignath & Marcel V. J. Veenman 2021 (2)

Charlotte Dignath & Marcel V. J. Veenman. (2021). The Role of Direct Strategy Instruction and Indirect Activation of Self-Regulated Learning—Evidence from Classroom Observation Studies. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0

q2 · i? · review · r2

Same ATES-based observation study by Kistner et al. The review reports that "Indirect activation of SRL, measured as the degree of autonomy, was negatively associated with students ' reading performance", a counterintuitive finding the review reports without further explanation.

"Indirect activation of SRL, measured as the degree of autonomy, was negatively associated with students ' reading performance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id direct-support-strategy-use-autonomy-negative-reading
title Teachers' direct instructional support is associated with students' use of self-regulation strategies, while autonomy as indirect activation was negatively associated with reading performance
description Teachers' direct instructional support is associated with students' use of self-regulation strategies, while autonomy as indirect activation was negatively associated with reading performance
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — charlotte-dignath-marcel-v-j-veenman-2021, charlotte-dignath-marcel-v-j-veenman-2021-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.