Academic dishonesty measure type moderates performance goal associations: behavioral and intention measures reveal positive links that self-reports mask¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr3·q3·i1–i2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 For performance-approach goals, behavioral measures were positively associated with academic dishonesty (r = 0.237), significantly different from self-report measures. → Tanja Fritz 2023
q3 i1 For performance-avoidance goals, intention measures were positively associated with academic dishonesty (r = 0.148), significantly different from self-report measures. → Tanja Fritz 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Tanja Fritz 2023¶
Tanja Fritz, Hernán González Cruz, Stefan Janke, Martin Daumiller. (2023). Elucidating the Associations Between Achievement Goals and Academic Dishonesty: a Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09753-1
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3
Meta-regression moderator analysis of dishonesty measure type: behavioral measures showed r = 0.237, 95% CI = [0.083, 0.373] for performance-approach goals, while self-reports showed no significant association.
"For performance-approach goals, self-report and intention measures were not significantly associated with academic dishonesty, but behavioral measures were significantly different from self-report measures by being positively associated with academic dishonesty (r = 0.237, 95% CI = [0.083, 0.373])"
Tanja Fritz 2023 (2)¶
Tanja Fritz, Hernán González Cruz, Stefan Janke, Martin Daumiller. (2023). Elucidating the Associations Between Achievement Goals and Academic Dishonesty: a Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09753-1
q3 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r3
Meta-regression moderator analysis: intention measures showed r = 0.148, 95% CI = [0.068, 0.300] for performance-avoidance goals; the difference remained significant when the single behavioral measure was removed.
"For performance-avoidance goals, self-report and behavioral measures (based on one effect size) were not significantly associ ated with academic dishonesty, but intention measures were significantly different from self-report measures by being positively associated with academic dishonesty (r = 0.148, 95% CI = [0.068, 0.300])"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Most research on achievement goals and academic dishonesty relies on correlational designs, self-report dishonesty measures, and personal goal measures — related
- Performance goals show heterogeneous, near-zero average associations with academic dishonesty — related
- Work-avoidance goals show a small positive association with academic dishonesty — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dishonesty-measure-type-moderates-performance-goals |
title |
Academic dishonesty measure type moderates performance goal associations: behavioral and intention measures reveal positive links that self-reports mask |
description |
Academic dishonesty measure type moderates performance goal associations: behavioral and intention measures reveal positive links that self-reports mask |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — tanja-fritz-2023, tanja-fritz-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.