Disrupting the event structure of dynamic visualizations — deleting event boundaries or inserting commercials between boundaries — reduces recall of the depicted events¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Participants viewing videos from which event boundaries had been deleted recalled a lower proportion of subevents than participants viewing other versions. → Spanjers 2010
q2 i? Inserting commercials between event boundaries reduced recall of a mini-series episode, while inserting more commercials at event boundaries had a positive effect on recall. → Spanjers 2010 (2)
Evidence¶
Spanjers 2010¶
Spanjers, I. A. E., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). A Theoretical Analysis of How Segmentation of Dynamic Visualizations Optimizes Students' Learning. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9135-6
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports Schwan and Garsoffky's (2004) experiment with videos of cleaning a pistol or upgrading a computer, unaltered or with black screens replacing event boundaries or parts between them; the boundary-deleted version yielded lower recall of subevents. No effect size is printed.
"Moreover, participants who viewed the video from which event boundaries had been deleted recalled a lower proportion of the subevents than the participants from the other groups, which might be due to disruption of the event structure, reduced coherence of the video, and a lower proportion of relevant steps shown."
Spanjers 2010 (2)¶
Spanjers, I. A. E., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). A Theoretical Analysis of How Segmentation of Dynamic Visualizations Optimizes Students' Learning. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9135-6
q2 · i? · theoretical · r3
The review reports Boltz's (1992) experiment showing an episode of a mini-series with commercials inserted at or between event boundaries; the between-boundaries version was recalled less well. No effect size is printed.
"She hypothesized that insertion of commercials between event boundaries would hinder perceiving the underlying event structure of the episode. Her results were in line with this hypothesis: Participants who saw this version recalled less from the episode than participants who saw another version."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Temporal cueing of event boundaries, such as adding key frames to dynamic visualizations, improves posttest performance — related
- Individually removing objectives, examples, or review from a well-designed computer-based lesson did not significantly reduce achievement — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
disrupting-event-structure-reduces-recall |
title |
Disrupting the event structure of dynamic visualizations — deleting event boundaries or inserting commercials between boundaries — reduces recall of the depicted events |
description |
Disrupting the event structure of dynamic visualizations — deleting event boundaries or inserting commercials between boundaries — reduces recall of the depicted events |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — spanjers-2010, spanjers-2010-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.