Claims

Positive relationship between DLC interaction and academic achievement persists when controlling for prior metacognitive abilities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In hierarchical regression models controlling for MSLQ prescores, completion of reflection modules 7, 8, and 2 emerged as significant predictors of final exam score. → Sijmkens 2024

Evidence

Sijmkens 2024

Sijmkens, E., De Cock, M., & De Laet, T. (2023). Scaffolding Students' Use of Metacognitive Activities Using Discipline- and Topic-Specific Reflective Prompts. Metacognition and Learning, 18(3), 811–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09363-w

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Hierarchical regression analysis with N=272 students who completed the MSLQ pretest, predicting final exam score from completion of nine reflection modules and MSLQ subscale prescores. Modules 7, 8, and 2 and the time/effort regulation prescore emerged as significant predictors.

"In the hierarchical regression model with students' final exam score as outcome variable the following indicators emerged as significant predictors: completion of reflection module 7, students' prescore on the 'time and study environment and effort regulation' scale of the MSLQ, completion of reflection module 8, and completion of reflection module 2"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dlc-achievement-persists-controlling-prior-metacognition
title Positive relationship between DLC interaction and academic achievement persists when controlling for prior metacognitive abilities
description Positive relationship between DLC interaction and academic achievement persists when controlling for prior metacognitive abilities
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sijmkens-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.