Claims

Digital learning resources increase prescribing-related knowledge test scores compared with preintervention testing or no education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? All 19 reviewed articles measuring knowledge acquisition reported that the digital learning intervention increased test scores relative to preintervention testing or no education. → Bakkum 2019

Evidence

Bakkum 2019

Bakkum, M.J., Tichelaar, J., Wellink, A., Richir, M.C. & van Agtmael, M.A. (2019). Digital Learning to Improve Safe and Effective Prescribing: A Systematic Review. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1549

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Systematic review synthesis of 19 articles using knowledge acquisition as outcome; all reported increased test scores versus preintervention testing or no education. The review notes "All 19 articles that used knowledge acquisition as outcome reported the intervention to increase test scores."

"All 19 articles that used knowledge acquisition as outcome reported the intervention to increase test scores as compared with preintervention testing or no education."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.