Claims

A post-exam survey found the DOT-format online exam well received: 76.9% of students rated time sufficiency 3 or above and 80.8% rated interface convenience 3 or above on 5-point scales.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Majorities of students rated the exam duration and platform interface favourably, and 96.1% found question difficulty within the acceptable range when excluding the extremes. → Mengzhou Li 2021

Evidence

Mengzhou Li 2021

Mengzhou Li, Lei Luo, Sujoy Sikdar, Navid Ibtehaj Nizam, Shan Gao, Hongming Shan, Melanie Kruger, Uwe Kruger, Hisham Mohamed, Lirong Xia and Ge Wang. (2021). Optimized collusion prevention for online exams during social distancing. npj Science of Learning 6:5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-00083-3

q2 · i? · design · r2

Post-exam survey administered through SurveyMonkey after the DOT final exam. Close to 70% voted the question difficulty "reasonable", and 96.1% found difficulty acceptable (choices 2-4); around 59% said the format was similar to other online exams they had taken.

"76.9% of students (Fig. 3a) rated the duration for answering questions to be 3 or above out of a 5 point scale ranging from Very Insufficient (1) to Very Sufficient (5), and 80.8% students (Fig. 3b) rated the convenience of using the platform's interface to be 3 or above"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dot-post-exam-survey-reception
title A post-exam survey found the DOT-format online exam well received: 76.9% of students rated time sufficiency 3 or above and 80.8% rated interface convenience 3 or above on 5-point scales.
description A post-exam survey found the DOT-format online exam well received: 76.9% of students rated time sufficiency 3 or above and 80.8% rated interface convenience 3 or above on 5-point scales.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mengzhou-li-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.