Double-content examples had no significant effect on generating alternatives of action, drawing inferences, or taking multiple perspectives¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Increases in alternatives of action, inferences, and multiple perspectives did not differ significantly between groups with and without double-content examples. → Jasmin Lilian Bauersfeld 2025
Evidence¶
Jasmin Lilian Bauersfeld 2025¶
Jasmin Lilian Bauersfeld, Bernadette Gold. (2025). Complete or faded double-content examples of video-based analyses: How do they impact student teachers' professional vision of classroom management? Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09738-3
q3 · i? · causal · r1
One-way ANOVAs on residualized change scores in the quasi-experimental pre-post study showed no significant group differences for alternatives of action, F(2,406) = 1.03, p = .358, η² = .005, and similarly null results for inferences and multiple perspectives (both η² = .002).
"Alternatives of action 1.03 2,406 .358 .537 .005"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Inferencing — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Studying double-content examples before video-based analyses hindered student teachers' noticing and reasoning compared to studying without them — related
- Self-explanations from faded double-content examples did not predict change in professional vision, with two isolated exceptions — related
- Complete and faded double-content examples did not differentially affect student teachers' professional vision — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
double-content-examples-no-effect-other-measures |
title |
Double-content examples had no significant effect on generating alternatives of action, drawing inferences, or taking multiple perspectives |
description |
Double-content examples had no significant effect on generating alternatives of action, drawing inferences, or taking multiple perspectives |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jasmin-lilian-bauersfeld-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.