The evolutionary analogy for a smaller working memory being more efficient is doubtful¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The authors doubt Sweller's argument that a smaller working memory is more efficient, since a larger working memory would allow longer operation sequences to be stored and anticipated. → Schnotz 2007

Evidence¶

Schnotz 2007¶

Schnotz, W., Kürschner, C. (2007). A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychology Review 19, 469–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

Theoretical counter-argument in the notes: the authors are "in doubt, however, whether the analogy between biological evolution and cognition really holds", arguing a larger working memory would be "more advantageous for learning than a smaller working memory".

"A larger working memory would then allow longer sequences of operations being stored and memorized and, thus, be more advantageous for learning than a smaller working memory."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The collective working memory effect: group learning is more efficient than individual learning for high-complexity tasks, but individual learning is more efficient for low-complexity tasks
• The definitions of cognitive load used in cognitive load theory are not fully equivalent
• Building extensive, well-organized domain knowledge may enhance functional use of intelligence in novel problems — related