Claims

Neither age nor gender significantly moderated DRC treatment effects, though subgroup samples were small

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Age and gender showed no significant impact on baseline or the change from baseline to intervention in the fully conditional model. → Pyle 2017

Evidence

Pyle 2017

Pyle, K. K., & Fabiano, G. A. (2017). Daily Report Card Intervention and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Studies. Manuscript submitted to Exceptional Children October 2016; accepted March 2017. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED583708

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Fully conditional HLM model with student-level moderators. The quote reports "Age (n = 37; range 4-14) and gender (n = 37; 25 male) showed no significant impact". No effect size printed; equivalence not tested. Limitations note girls (n = 11) and children over 10 (n = 9) were small subgroups.

"Age (n = 37; range 4-14) and gender (n = 37; 25 male) showed no significant impact on baseline or the change from baseline to intervention (see Table 5)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.