Claims

DTT implementation fidelity declines slightly after training ends, with a statistically significant difference between intervention and maintenance slopes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The change in rate between the intervention-phase slope and the maintenance-phase slope was −4.39, statistically significant at p < .025. → Joelle Fingerhut 2022

Evidence

Joelle Fingerhut 2022

Joelle Fingerhut, & Mariola Moeyaert. (2022). Training Individuals to Implement Discrete Trials with Fidelity: A Meta-Analysis. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 37(4), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576221081076

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Model 1 of the HLM meta-analysis applied to maintenance observations, which occurred "between 4 and 224 days" after the last intervention session among the 51 participants (23%) with a maintenance phase. No standardized effect size is printed.

"The change in rate between the slope of the intervention phase and the slope of the maintenance phase was −4.39, γ̂200 = −4.39, t(3399) = −2.86, p < .025."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.