Funding dual-enrollment courses at high school campuses addresses transportation-based access inequities¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? After reviewing resource inequities, funding was made available for dual-enrollment courses offered at high school campuses that were too far for students to commute to community colleges. → Taylor 2024

Evidence¶

Taylor 2024¶

Taylor, T., & Bowman, A. (2024). Identifying Resource Inequities. Region 15 Comprehensive Center at WestEd. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED593369.pdf

q2 · i? · design · r1

A district example from the Examples of Addressing Resource Inequities section, describing how proximity-based dual-enrollment access was addressed by funding on-campus courses. No outcome data or effect size is reported.

"Dual-enrollment offerings for high school students were available in schools based on their proximity to community colleges. After reviewing resource inequities, funding was made available for dual-enrollment courses offered at high school campuses that were too far for students to commute."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Colleges with higher percentages of academically disadvantaged students spent less per FTE student, suggesting possible resource inequities — related
• Dual enrollment classes taken on college campuses increase students' likelihood of attending college and earning a bachelor's degree — related
• Shifting staffing decisions from a per-pupil formula to needs-based allocation addresses staffing resource inequities — related