Claims

A dual intrinsic/extraneous load framework is sufficient, non-redundant, and makes the boundaries of cognitive load theory transparent

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The article proposes that the dual intrinsic/extraneous framework is sufficient and non-redundant and makes the theory's boundaries transparent. → Kalyuga 2011

Evidence

Kalyuga 2011

Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need?. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7

q1 · i? · theoretical · r?

The article's central proposal, stated in the abstract: the "dual intrinsic/extraneous framework is sufficient and non-redundant" and "makes boundaries of the theory transparent". This is a theoretical recommendation, not an empirical result.

"The article suggests that the dual intrinsic/extraneous framework is sufficient and non-redundant and makes boundaries of the theory transparent."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dual-intrinsic-extraneous-framework-sufficient
title A dual intrinsic/extraneous load framework is sufficient, non-redundant, and makes the boundaries of cognitive load theory transparent
description A dual intrinsic/extraneous load framework is sufficient, non-redundant, and makes the boundaries of cognitive load theory transparent
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2011
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kalyuga-2011

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.