Claims

Reliable dynamic-video social feedback produces more widespread cortical activation, better positive/negative feedback differentiation, and greater impact on word learning than symbolic feedback

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Social feedback had a greater overall impact on word learning, shown by correlations between ERP/pupillometry measures and post-training performance scores. → Ana Zappa 2025

Evidence

Ana Zappa 2025

Ana Zappa, Mel Slater & Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells. (2025). Social interaction shapes and boosts second language learning: virtual reality can show us how. npj Science of Learning 10:90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00381-8

q2 · i? · review · r2

In the same ERP/pupillometry study (Zappa et al., in press), correlations between ERP and pupillometry measures and post-training performance indicated a greater overall impact of social feedback on word learning. Correlational support only; no effect size printed.

"Furthermore, social feedback had a greater overall impact on word learning, as shown by correlations between the ERP and pupillometry measures and post-training performance scores (Zappa et al., in press)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.