Claims

Students preferred e-models used alongside physical models, suggesting digital tools alone may not fully replace traditional methods

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? While e-models were well received, students expressed a preference for using them alongside physical models rather than digital tools alone. → Baxmann Martin 2024

Evidence

Baxmann Martin 2024

Baxmann Martin, Baráth Zoltán, Kárpáti Krisztina. (2024). Efficacy of typodont and simulation training in orthodontic education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06425-8

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review attributes this to Ho et al. (2022), a mixed-methods study of 40 students using 3D digital dental models (e-models), which found higher acceptance of e-models, increased mouse-clicks in diagnostic tasks, and improved diagnostic performance.

"while e-models were well received, students expressed a preference for using them alongside physical models, suggesting that digital tools alone may not fully replace traditional learning methods"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.