Eager students (high talk, high engagement) achieved the best reading literacy scores and disconnected students (low talk, low engagement) the worst, with only the eager–disconnected difference statistically significant¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Among the five profiles, only eager and disconnected students differed significantly in reading literacy (eager > disconnected); other pairwise differences were not significant. → Sedova 2023
Evidence¶
Sedova 2023¶
Sedova, K., & Sedlacek, M. (2023). How vocal and silent forms of participation in combination relate to student achievement. Instructional Science, 51, 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09609-1
q2 · i? · associational · r2
ANOVA on reading literacy success rates across the five profiles (Table 6: eager M = 53.08%, disconnected M = 41.16%, overall F = 2.47, p < 0.05) with Bonferroni post hoc comparisons; only the eager > disconnected contrast was significant. Equivalence between other profiles was not tested.
"The ANOV A and pairwise comparison results suggested that students in the five identified profile groups differed in their reading literacy tests (Table 6). However, there was only a significant difference between eager and disconnected."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- High internal behavioral engagement without classroom talk does not guarantee achievement: the diligent profile ranked fourth — related
- Gender is unevenly distributed across participation profiles: boys are overrepresented among disconnected and girls among diligent students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
eager-best-disconnected-worst-achievement |
title |
Eager students (high talk, high engagement) achieved the best reading literacy scores and disconnected students (low talk, low engagement) the worst, with only the eager–disconnected difference statistically significant |
description |
Eager students (high talk, high engagement) achieved the best reading literacy scores and disconnected students (low talk, low engagement) the worst, with only the eager–disconnected difference statistically significant |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sedova-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.