Claims

Grades 3-4 students in an EALP-based early algebra intervention made significant improvements in constructing function tables and outperformed control students at posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Grade 3 and 4 experimental students significantly improved in completing a function table and outperformed control students at posttest (p < 0.01), while grade 5 students were already fairly successful at pretest. → Stephens 2011

Evidence

Stephens 2011

Stephens, A. C., Isler, I., Marum, T., Blanton, M. L., Knuth, E. J., & Gardiner, A. M. (2011). From recursive pattern to correspondence rule: Developing students' abilities to engage in functional thinking. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED585054

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-post quasi-experimental comparison of approximately 300 students in six experimental and ten control classrooms; Table 1 reports proportions rising from .359 to .868 (grade 3) and .512 to .932 (grade 4) for experimental students, with "oXtperformed control stXdents at posttest" (p < 0.01).

"Grades 3±4 e[perimental stXdents made significant improvements over the coXrse of the intervention and oXtperformed control stXdents at posttest."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.