Claims

EBP attitude change depends on measurement timing: immediate post-test measures show no difference while longer-term measures show improvement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Studies measuring attitudes immediately after intervention found no significant difference, while studies measuring over longer durations found significant improvement over time. → Ramis Mary-Anne 2019

Evidence

Ramis Mary-Anne 2019

Ramis Mary-Anne, Chang Anne, Conway Aaron, Lim David, Munday Judy, Nissen Lisa. (2019). Theory-based strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1698-4

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis across the five theory-based studies comparing immediate versus longer-term attitude measurement; the review reports a fluctuation of effect with significant increase at week one (p < 0.001) and overall significant increase from baseline at 37 weeks (p = 0.007) in one study.

"The two studies reporting no significant difference in EBP attitudes [45, 46] were measured immediately after the intervention, while results from Liabsuetrakul et al. found improvement in EBP attitudes over time [47, 48]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.