Claims

The effortful control–DLPFC activation model is specific to effortful control, not to negative affectivity or surgency

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The negative affectivity latent factor did not predict activation (β = .09, p = .449) or accuracy (β = -.16, p = .154). → Quiñones-Camacho Laura E. 2019 q3 i? The surgency latent factor did not predict activation (β = -.02, p = .804) or accuracy (β = -.12, p = .205). → Quiñones-Camacho Laura E. 2019 (2)

Evidence

Quiñones-Camacho Laura E. 2019

Quiñones-Camacho Laura E., Fishburn Frank A., Camacho M. Catalina, Wakschlag Lauren S., Perlman Susan B. (2019). Cognitive flexibility-related prefrontal activation in preschoolers: A biological approach to temperamental effortful control. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969345/

q3 · i? · associational · r2

A follow-up SEM with a negative affectivity latent factor (sadness, fear, anger, discomfort, soothability) showed good fit but "did not predict activation (β = .09, SE = 6.07, p = .449) or accuracy (β = -.16, SE = 3.96, p = .154)."

"The negative affectivity latent factor did not predict activation (β = .09, SE = 6.07, p = .449) or accuracy (β = -.16, SE = 3.96, p = .154)."

Quiñones-Camacho Laura E. 2019 (2)

Quiñones-Camacho Laura E., Fishburn Frank A., Camacho M. Catalina, Wakschlag Lauren S., Perlman Susan B. (2019). Cognitive flexibility-related prefrontal activation in preschoolers: A biological approach to temperamental effortful control. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969345/

q3 · i? · associational · r2

A follow-up SEM with a surgency latent factor (high intensity pleasure, impulsivity, activity level, positive anticipation, shyness) showed excellent fit but "did not predict activation (β = -.02, SE = 6.82, p = .804) or accuracy (β = -.12, SE = 4.38, p = .205)."

"As expected, the surgency latent factor did not predict activation (β = -.02, SE = 6.82, p = .804) or accuracy (β = -.12, SE = 4.38, p = .205)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ec-activation-model-specific-to-effortful-control
title The effortful control–DLPFC activation model is specific to effortful control, not to negative affectivity or surgency
description The effortful control–DLPFC activation model is specific to effortful control, not to negative affectivity or surgency
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
recheck_by 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — quiñones-camacho-laura-e-2019, quiñones-camacho-laura-e-2019-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.