Claims

After the Alice/4C-ID treatment, logical reasoning (ECDL) improved significantly in the control group but not in the experimental group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the experimental group, the pre-to-post change in ECDL logical reasoning was not statistically significant (t(5) = 1.00; p = 0.182), with means of 12.50 before and 12.83 after. → Costa and Miranda 2019

Evidence

Costa and Miranda 2019

Costa, J. M., & Miranda, G. L. (2019). Using Alice Software with 4C-ID Model: Effects in Programming Knowledge and Logical Reasoning. Informatics in Education, 18(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.01

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t-Student test on ECDL scores before and after the two-month treatment in the very-low-SES experimental group (n = 6). The article reports the change was not significant; no effect size is printed.

"In the experimental group, the improvement wasn't significant (t (5) = 1.00; p = 0.182). Before the experimental treatment this group obtained the average of 12.50 (SEM = 1.565) and after the experimental treatment the average was 12.83 (SEM = 1.778)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.