Stronger eco-mindedness raises initial eco-mode preference, but this advantage diminishes as response latency increases¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 In eco mode 1, participants with medium and high eco-mindedness were significantly more likely to select eco modes than low-eco-mindedness participants (Medium: OR = 8.95, p = .046; High: OR = 50.34, p = .006). → Hyeonwook Kim 2026
q2 i? Higher-latency modes showed very low baseline selection odds relative to mode 1, indicating the eco-mindedness advantage diminishes as delays grow. → Hyeonwook Kim 2026
Evidence¶
Hyeonwook Kim 2026¶
Hyeonwook Kim, Xuesi Chen, Alex Cabral, Cindy Kaiying Lin, Udit Gupta, Josiah Hester. (2026). When LLMs Slow Down: How Environmental Impacts Mediate University Students' LLM Usage. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23968 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.23968
q2 · i3 · design · r2
A mixed-effects model compared eco-mode preference across personal-norm groups (Low 21–30, Medium 31–38, High 39–47) from a validated 10-item instrument. "participants with medium and high levels of eco-mindedness were significantly more likely to select eco modes" in mode 1; modes 4–5 showed OR ≈ 0, p > .85.
"In eco mode 1, participants with medium and high levels of eco-mindedness were significantly more likely to select eco modes (Medium: OR = 8.95,p=.046; High: OR = 50.34,p=.006) than those with low eco-mindedness"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Recognizing carbon-saving impacts increases the likelihood of selecting eco modes in LLM interactions — related
- Eco-mode selection in an LLM interface declines sharply as response latency increases, dropping from about 45% of interactions in eco mode 1 to below 5% in eco mode 5 — related
- User satisfaction with eco modes declines sharply from mode 1 (mean 3.64) to modes 4–5 (means 2.35 and 2.06) — related
- Most participants expressed reluctance to adopt an eco-feedback LLM for regular use, with nearly two-thirds reporting some degree of unwillingness — related
- Interacting with an eco-feedback LLM interface surfaces gaps in students' understanding of digital sustainability and supports learning about the environmental impact of everyday LLM use — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
eco-mindedness-raises-baseline-eco-preference-limited-by-latency |
title |
Stronger eco-mindedness raises initial eco-mode preference, but this advantage diminishes as response latency increases |
description |
Stronger eco-mindedness raises initial eco-mode preference, but this advantage diminishes as response latency increases |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — hyeonwook-kim-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.