Claims

VIS version of Ecolab produced greatest average improvement in test scores but was not most successful for all ability groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The VIS version of the Ecolab produced the greatest average improvement in test scores, but was not the most successful system with learners of all abilities. → Rosemary Luckin & Benedict du Boulay 2016 q2 i? Mean improvement amongst WIS users in the high ability group was greater than for VIS and NIS, and mean learning gains for low ability NIS users were higher than for WIS and VIS. → Rosemary Luckin & Benedict du Boulay 2016

Evidence

Rosemary Luckin & Benedict du Boulay 2016

Rosemary Luckin & Benedict du Boulay. (2016). Reflections on the Ecolab and the Zone of Proximal Development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0072-x

q2 · i? · design · r2

Classroom evaluation of three Ecolab versions (VIS, WIS, NIS) with pre and post tests identifying learning gains. The article notes one must bear in mind the small number of participants.

"The VIS version of the Ecolab produced the greatest average improvement in test scores, but was not the most successful system with learners of all abilities. The mean improvement amongst WIS users who were in the high ability group was greater than those for VIS and NIS."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ecolab-vis-greatest-average-gains-not-uniform
title VIS version of Ecolab produced greatest average improvement in test scores but was not most successful for all ability groups
description VIS version of Ecolab produced greatest average improvement in test scores but was not most successful for all ability groups
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — rosemary-luckin-benedict-du-boulay-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.