Expert validation rated the hypothetical EDI model as feasible across macro-strategy, micro-strategy, potential, and accommodation aspects¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q1 i? An expert of learning structure judged the hypothetical EDI model feasible, with scores reported for scope, clarity, integration, rationality, MMA support, problem-solving support, flexibility, and accommodation. → Mansyur 2016

Evidence¶

Mansyur 2016¶

Mansyur, J., & Darsikin. (2016). Enhancing Direct Instruction on Introductory Physics for Supporting Students' Mental-Modeling Ability. International Education Studies, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n6p32

q1 · i? · design · r2

Expert validation of the hypothetical model (Table 5), with aspects and indicators covering macro strategy, micro strategy, potential aspect, and accommodation, each scored out of a maximum of 4. The article states the validation was conducted "to obtain its feasibility" and shows the model as having potential characteristics.

"The hypothetical design was also validated by an expert of learning structure to obtain its feasibility. Table 5 presents the result of the e xpert validation."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• EDI qualitatively outperformed DI on MMA normalized gain, though both groups' gains were in the low category — related
• Interviewed students responded positively to the EDI learning structure and the emphasis on diagrams — related