Claims

The attitude gains from Edmodo use held for liking, difficulty and integrative values but not for instrumental values of EFL learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Instrumental values was the only attitude dimension with no significant pre-post difference, while the other three dimensions improved significantly in favor of the post scale. → Al-Kathiri 2014

Evidence

Al-Kathiri 2014

Fatimah Al-Kathiri. (2014). Beyond the Classroom Walls: Edmodo in Saudi Secondary School EFL Instruction, Attitudes and Challenges. English Language Teaching, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n1p189

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Dimension-level analysis of the experimental group's pre-post attitude scales (liking, difficulty, integrative values, instrumental values). The article reports "no significant differences" for instrumental values; equivalence was not tested and no effect size is printed.

"Table 5 shows that theinstrumental values of EFL learning is the only dimension that has no significant differences whereas thethree otheroneshave significant differences in favor of the post scale."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.