Claims

The EDPR editorial board spans 50 members from 10 countries across 4 continents, and the editor sees more diversity as valuable

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The current editorial board comprises 50 members from 10 countries in 4 continents, and the incoming editor states that more geographic diversity would be valuable. → Fred Paas 2015

Evidence

Fred Paas 2015

Fred Paas. (2015). Incoming Editor's Editorial. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9347-x

q1 · i? · theoretical · r1

Editorial description of the journal's governance: the printed figures are 50 Editorial Board Members from 10 countries in 4 continents. The editor's stated view is that "more diversity would be valuable."

"The current team of 50 Editorial Board Members comes from 10 countries in 4 continents. I think that more diversity would be valuable."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id edpr-board-geographic-diversity
title The EDPR editorial board spans 50 members from 10 countries across 4 continents, and the editor sees more diversity as valuable
description The EDPR editorial board spans 50 members from 10 countries across 4 continents, and the editor sees more diversity as valuable
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — fred-paas-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.