Claims

Executive function performance significantly predicts semantic fluency in preschool children

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In a two-way ANOVA, executive functions (Dimensional Card Sorting pass/fail) had a statistically significant effect on semantic fluency (p=.03). → Biscevic 2018

Evidence

Biscevic 2018

Biscevic, I., Pasalic, A., & Memisevic, H. (2018). The effects of executive functions and theory of mind on semantic fluency in preschool children. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(1). https://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/ doi:10.33225/pec/18.76.21

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Two-way ANOVA in a correlational study of 116 preschool children (mean age 58.8 months) tested EF (card-sort pass/fail) and TOM as predictors of animals-category word production in 60 seconds. The article reports "a significant effect of EF on semantic fluency test" (p=.03 in Table 2); no effect size is printed.

"According to the two-way ANOV A test, there was a significant effect of EF on semantic fluency test."

Studies bearing on this claim

Do young children's executive functions (and theory of mind) predict their language and early academic skills? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 7 narrower claims that bear on it: 5 distinct studies (3 associational, 2 causal), q2–q3, 0 of 5 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.

Study Design Effect as recorded Bears on this claim through
Biscevic 2018 q3 · associational · r1 i? this claim; Preschool children who pass both EF and TOM tests score significantly higher on semantic f (supports); Theory of mind effect on semantic fluency in preschool children is statistically non-signi (qualifies); No interaction effect of executive functions and theory of mind on semantic fluency in pre (qualifies)
Tara Hofkens 2022 q3 · associational · r? i? Children's executive function at the beginning of pre-kindergarten predicts growth in math (supports); Growth in task orientation partially mediates the association between executive function a (supports)
Vadasy 2023 q3 · causal · r2 i? Higher pretest cognitive flexibility predicted greater decoding gains and compensated for (supports)
Mischel, Ebbesen, and Raskoff Zeiss 1972 q3 · causal · r? i? Early ability to delay gratification predicts later academic and social outcomes, but the (qualifies)
Watts, Duncan, and Quan 2018 q2 · associational · r2 i? Early ability to delay gratification predicts later academic and social outcomes, but the (qualifies)

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ef-significant-effect-semantic-fluency-preschool
title Executive function performance significantly predicts semantic fluency in preschool children
description Executive function performance significantly predicts semantic fluency in preschool children
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — biscevic-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.