Claims

The EI–academic success effect size varies significantly by EI subscale, with perceiving emotions highest (r = .20)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Mean effect size significantly varied by EI subscale, Q(3) = 18.87, p = .04; perceiving emotions showed the highest correlation (r = .20), followed by facilitating emotions (r = .13) and understanding emotions (r = .11). → Alabbasi Ahmed M. Abdulla 2023

Evidence

Alabbasi Ahmed M. Abdulla 2023

Alabbasi Ahmed M. Abdulla, Alabbasi Fatema A., AlSaleh Aseel, Alansari Ahmed M., Sequeira Reginald P. (2023). Emotional intelligence weakly predicts academic success in medical programs: a multilevel meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04417-8

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Subscale-level moderator analysis in the multilevel meta-analysis. Perceiving emotions (m = 7, r = .20) best predicted academic performance among MSCEIT branches; managing emotions was non-significant (r = -.04) per Table 3.

"The highest correlation was found for skill in perceiving emotions (r = 0.20) followed by facilitating emotions (r = 0.13) and understanding emotions (r = 0.11)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.