Eight early-adopting districts use alternative measures of teacher effectiveness in evaluation or performance-related compensation systems¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Eight early-adopting school districts have been using alternative measures for teacher evaluations or performance-related compensation systems. → Brian Gill 2014
Evidence¶
Brian Gill 2014¶
Brian Gill, Brittany English, Joshua Furgeson, Moira McCullough. (2014). Alternative Student Growth Measures for Teacher Evaluation: Profiles of Early-Adopting Districts (Executive Summary). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/alternative-student-growth-measures-for-teacher-evaluation-profiles-of-early-adopting-districts-executive-summary
q1 · i? · associational · r1
Descriptive profile study by REL Mid-Atlantic of eight early-adopting districts, as stated in the executive summary: the study "looks at eight districts that have been using alternative measures" in evaluation or compensation. No effect sizes are reported in the summary.
"This REL Mid-Atlantic study looks at eight districts that have been using alternative measures for teacher evaluations or performance-related compensation systems."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Early-adopting districts used alternative student growth measures alongside other measures in formal teacher evaluations — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Alternative student growth measures, especially student learning objectives, were used for many purposes beyond teacher evaluation — related
- Evidence on reliability and validity of alternative student growth measures, especially student learning objectives, is limited — related
- Educator evaluation systems combine student growth measures with other performance measures such as classroom observation scores to identify highest- and lowest-performing teachers — related
- Districts implemented most components of the performance-based compensation system throughout all four years, but fewer than half planned to keep offering performance bonuses once the grant ended — related
- Evaluation systems including alternative student growth measures showed a wider range of teacher performance than previous systems lacking growth measures — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
eight-districts-use-alternative-teacher-effectiveness-measures |
title |
Eight early-adopting districts use alternative measures of teacher effectiveness in evaluation or performance-related compensation systems |
description |
Eight early-adopting districts use alternative measures of teacher effectiveness in evaluation or performance-related compensation systems |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — brian-gill-2014 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.