The buy-in typology was derived from 39 interviewed principals, whose evaluation attitudes in the table are described as mostly positive¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The typology table reports percentages out of 39 interviewed principals, with mostly positive evaluation attitudes recorded for the paradigm-shift type. → Excellence in Teaching: Year 1 Report on the Pilot in the Chicago Public Schools (working draft 2006
Evidence¶
Excellence in Teaching: Year 1 Report on the Pilot in the Chicago Public Schools (working draft 2006¶
Excellence in Teaching: Year 1 Report on the Pilot in the Chicago Public Schools (working draft, not for citation without author permission). (2006). University of Chicago Urban Education Institute / Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://uei.uchicago.edu
q2 · i? · qualitative · r?
Descriptive table analysis of principal exit interviews in the pilot. The table reports each type's share as a "Percentage of 39 Interviewed Principals", and the paradigm-shift row's evaluation attitudes are "Mostly positive"; no effect size is printed.
"Percentage of 39 Interviewed Principals Paradigm shift Principal Mostly positive Mostly positive High buy in, paradigm shift High"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The report classifies interviewed principals into a buy-in typology whose table records framework conferences, evaluation attitudes, description of teacher buy-in, changes in practice, and severity for 39 principals — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Principals of the paradigm-shift type reported high buy-in and a paradigm shift, and their reported influence on instructional grouping, assessment, planning, and general instructional practice was rated high — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Fifty-seven percent of principals were highly enthusiastic about the Framework-based evaluation process while 43 percent held mixed to negative attitudes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
eit-39-principals-mostly-positive-attitudes |
title |
The buy-in typology was derived from 39 interviewed principals, whose evaluation attitudes in the table are described as mostly positive |
description |
The buy-in typology was derived from 39 interviewed principals, whose evaluation attitudes in the table are described as mostly positive |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2006 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — excellence-in-teaching-year-1-report-on-the-pilot-in-the-chicago-public-schools-working-draft-2006 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.