Claims

In math, ELs grew more than never-ELs during academic years but lost more during summers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? During kindergarten-to-4th-grade academic years, ELs gained more math than never-ELs, but they lost more during summers. → Johnson 2022

Evidence

Johnson 2022

Johnson, A. (2022). Achievement and growth for English Learners. Educational Policy, 37(4), 1044–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211049419

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Longitudinal math growth analysis from K-4 comparing ELs and never-ELs across school-year and summer periods; the article reports ELs "grew more than never-ELs during academic years but lost more during summers." No effect size printed.

"In math, ELs grew more than never-ELs during academic years but lost more during summers."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id el-math-academic-year-growth-greater-summer-loss
title In math, ELs grew more than never-ELs during academic years but lost more during summers
description In math, ELs grew more than never-ELs during academic years but lost more during summers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — johnson-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.