Claims

Elaborated feedback did not significantly outperform non-elaborated KR feedback on achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Neither conceptual nor procedural elaborated feedback differed significantly from KR feedback on posttest achievement. → Fynn Töllner 2026

Evidence

Fynn Töllner 2026

Fynn Töllner, Poldi Kuhl, Michael Besser. (2026). Feedback complexities interact with prior knowledge. Learning and Instruction 105 (2026) 102413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102413

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Linear contrasts from the same multilevel model of the N = 190 RCT found no statistically significant difference between either elaborated feedback type and KR feedback; equivalence was not tested.

"Accordingly, as the test for linear contrasts demonstrated, neither conceptual feedback t(4.08) = 1.78, p = .888, 95% CI [ 12.79, 5.85] nor procedural feedback t(4.64) = 0.06, p = 1.00, 95% CI [ 9.78, 9.50] differed significantly from KR feedback."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id elaborated-not-superior-to-kr-feedback
title Elaborated feedback did not significantly outperform non-elaborated KR feedback on achievement
description Elaborated feedback did not significantly outperform non-elaborated KR feedback on achievement
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — fynn-töllner-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.