Regular-course students taught with the e-learning material scored more than 11 percentage points higher than control students on the same final test¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the regular course, the experimental group averaged 80.59% on the theoretical part and 68.24% on the practical part versus 69% and 53.16% for the control group, with the article reporting 99.485% and 97% chances that the material caused the differences. → Király 2016

Evidence¶

Király 2016¶

Sándor Király. (2016). How to Implement an E-learning Curriculum to Streamline Teaching Digital Image Processing. Acta Didactica Napocensia, Volume 9, Number 2. https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2065-1430

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Randomized two-group experiment in the regular course: experimental group used the e-learning material, control group used previous presentation slides; both took the same test with theoretical and practical exercises. Table 1 reports averages of 80.59% vs 69% (theory) and 68.24% vs 53.16% (practical), and the article attributes the "more than 11 percentage points" improvement to customizability, figures, demonstration software and interactive options.

"According to the two sample t -test, it has 99.485% chance of that the developed e -learning material caused the difference of achievements in the case of the theory test and that it has 97% chance of that the developed material caused the difference of achievements in the case of the practical test ."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Correspondence-course students taught with the e-learning material outscored controls by wider margins than in the regular course — related
• Revising the material based on log files, mapped learning habits and evaluation results raised achievement in the following semester — related