Claims

The authors conclude that elementary students are capable of sophisticated functional thinking and that this calls into question the lack of focus on covarying quantities in many elementary curricula and standards

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? After a year-long early algebra intervention, experimental students showed significant improvement in constructing function tables, identifying patterns or relationships, and representing functional rules verbally and symbolically. → Stephens 2011

Evidence

Stephens 2011

Stephens, A. C., Isler, I., Marum, T., Blanton, M. L., Knuth, E. J., & Gardiner, A. M. (2011). From recursive pattern to correspondence rule: Developing students' abilities to engage in functional thinking. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED585054

q3 · i? · causal · r1

The article's conclusion summarizes the study's significant pre-post findings by grade and states these findings support prior work asserting elementary students' capability for functional thinking, calling into question curricula that omit covarying quantities.

"([perimental stXdents shoZed significant improveme nt in this stXdy in their abilities to constrXct fXnction tables in grades 3 and 4 , identify patterns or relationships in tables in grade 3 , and represent a fXnctional rXle verbally in grades 3 and 4 and sy mbolically in all grades ."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.