ELM-ART served more than 20,000 users over more than 15 years, with more than 1000 completing the whole course¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Over many years of service, more than 20,000 people used ELM-ART and more than 1000 completed the whole course. → Gerhard Weber & Peter Brusilovsky 2016

Evidence¶

Gerhard Weber & Peter Brusilovsky 2016¶

Gerhard Weber & Peter Brusilovsky. (2016). ELM-ART – An Interactive and Intelligent Web-Based Electronic Textbook. Int J Artif Intell Educ 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0066-8

q2 · i? · design · r2

Descriptive usage accounting for the running ELM-ART system, not an experimental comparison. The article reports "more than 20,000 people" used the system and "More than 1000 of them completed the whole course", with many classes still using parts of the course. No effect sizes apply.

"Over many years of its service, more than 20,000 people from all over the world used ELM-ART. More than 1000 of them completed the whole course and gave interesting feedback."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students performed better in final programming tasks after learning with ELM-ART than with ELM-PE, especially students with lower levels of previous programming knowledge — related
• Being Web-based contributed to ELM-ART's educational effectiveness: it surpassed its locally available predecessor ELM-PE despite a smaller episodic learner model — related