Students who began as ELs were not overidentified for special education services relative to students never classified as ELs¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Over their academic careers, continuously-enrolled students who began as ELs were identified as needing IEPs at similar rates to students never classified as ELs, contradicting overidentification concerns. → de la Torre 2019
Evidence¶
de la Torre 2019¶
de la Torre, M., Blanchard, A., Allensworth, E.M., & Freire, S. (2019). English Learners in CPS: A new perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu
q2 · i? · associational · r?
Descriptive comparison of IEP identification rates across elementary grades (Table 1 shows 7 vs 5 percent in kindergarten, 11 vs 10 in third, 17 vs 15 in eighth). The report notes began-as-EL students with IEPs were more often identified with learning disabilities (75 vs 65 percent). No effect size is printed.
"Our results do not support this theory: over the course of their academic careers, continuously-enrolled CPS students who began as ELs were identified as needing IEPs at similar rates to students who were never classified as ELs."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students who began as ELs and demonstrated proficiency by eighth grade had academic outcomes similar to or higher than students never classified as ELs — related
- Students who began kindergarten as English Learners had similar achievement and growth, and higher attendance, compared to students never classified as ELs — related
- More than half of students who began as ELs passed the ACCESS proficiency exam by third grade and three-fourths by fifth grade; students who had not passed by fifth grade were unlikely to pass before high school — related
- ELs who did not reach proficiency by eighth grade showed continued growth but started first grade with much lower ACCESS scores, and rising grade-level thresholds meant they never met the proficiency cut — related
- GPAs were very similar for students who did and did not enter CPS as ELs, with a reading-grade gap that closed by seventh grade and similar Freshman OnTrack rates — related
- TEP's student population was similar to other neighborhood schools: high poverty, mostly Hispanic, with similar rates of special education services — related
- New programs increased training for leading special student populations, but sufficiency across all contexts remains debated — related
- The study gives explicit consideration to cultural differences and similarities in learning, including English learners and learners with learning disabilities — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
els-not-overidentified-special-education |
title |
Students who began as ELs were not overidentified for special education services relative to students never classified as ELs |
description |
Students who began as ELs were not overidentified for special education services relative to students never classified as ELs |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
recheck_by |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — de-la-torre-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.