Exploratory correlations suggest embodiment was specifically relevant in the re-experiencing group, correlating with written procedural knowledge and post-test self-efficacy¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i2 Within the re-experiencing group, embodiment correlated significantly with written procedural knowledge (r = 0.34) and post-test self-efficacy (r = 0.37), surviving Holm correction. → Valdemar Stenberdt 2025

Evidence¶

Valdemar Stenberdt 2025¶

Valdemar Stenberdt, Ban Mouid Shiwalia, Guido Makransky. (2025). Re-Experiencing vs. Self-Explaining: Comparing Generative Learning Activities in VR. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10096-2

q2 · i2 · causal · r2

Exploratory within-group correlation analyses (Appendix G) conducted after Welch t-tests found no between-group differences on other measured psychological variables. The correlations were specific to the re-experiencing group, suggesting embodiment "might be specifically relevant" there; exploratory, not confirmatory.

"significant correlations between embodiment and written procedural knowledge (r = 0.34) and post-test self-efficacy ( r = 0.37) for this group, even after applying Holm correction."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Self-explaining led to significantly higher written procedural knowledge than re-experiencing, opposite to the hypothesized direction — related
• Corrective feedback plus either GLA significantly improved students' safety behavior in VR, with no difference between re-experiencing and self-explaining — related
• Both GLA groups showed a large, significant increase in pipetting self-efficacy, with no difference between conditions — related