Claims

EMCQG generated more than 3 million distinct case-based questions for four physician specialities from the EMMeT ontology

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The implemented system generated more than 3 million questions for gastroenterology and hepatology, cardiology, internal medicine and orthopaedics. → J. Leo 2019

Evidence

J. Leo 2019

J. Leo, G. Kurdi, N. Matentzoglu, B. Parsia, U. Sattler, S. Forge, G. Donato, W. Dowling. (2019). Ontology-Based Generation of Medical, Multi-term MCQs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-018-00172-w

q2 · i? · design · r2

Effectiveness measure reported by the authors: the number of distinct questions generatable from EMMeT-OWL across four physician specialities. The count is the article's own printed figure; no statistical test accompanies it.

"We generate more than 3 million questions for four physician specialities and evaluate our approach in a user study with 15 medical experts."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id emcqg-three-million-questions-four-specialities
title EMCQG generated more than 3 million distinct case-based questions for four physician specialities from the EMMeT ontology
description EMCQG generated more than 3 million distinct case-based questions for four physician specialities from the EMMeT ontology
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — j-leo-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.