Claims

Emotional engagement is the most studied dimension of student engagement in SEC–SE research, largely surpassing multidimensional SE studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Of the reviewed studies, emotional engagement was analysed far more often (63 studies, 69.23%) than behavioural (16), cognitive (7), disengagement (7) or the full multidimensional SE concept (23). → Anabela Caetano Santos 2023

Evidence

Anabela Caetano Santos 2023

Anabela Caetano Santos, Celeste Simões, Márcia H.S. Melo, Margarida F. Santos, Iara Freitas, Cátia Branquinho, Carmel Cefai, Patrícia Arriaga. (2023). A systematic review of the association between social and emotional competencies and student engagement in youth. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100535

q3 · i? · review · r3

Descriptive synthesis of the 91 included studies. The review's Table 1 reports "Emotional engagement 63 69.23" percent, behavioural engagement 16 (17.39%), cognitive engagement 7 (7.69%), disengagement 7 (7.69%), and overall student engagement 23 (25.00%).

"Emotional engagement is the most studied dimension of student engagement and largely surpasses the number of studies that analysed the multidimensional SE concept."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id emotional-engagement-most-studied-dimension
title Emotional engagement is the most studied dimension of student engagement in SEC–SE research, largely surpassing multidimensional SE studies
description Emotional engagement is the most studied dimension of student engagement in SEC–SE research, largely surpassing multidimensional SE studies
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — anabela-caetano-santos-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.