Emotional framing intensity is associated with types of talk in argumentation, with low-intensity framing linked to cumulative talk and high-intensity framing to disputational talk¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Low-intensity emotional framing is usually related to cumulative talk, and disputational talk is often characterized by high-intensity emotional framing, though many interactional phases cannot be classified by these talk types. → Ludvigsen 2016

Evidence¶

Ludvigsen 2016¶

Ludvigsen, S. (2016). CSCL: connecting the social, emotional and cognitive dimensions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9236-4

q2 · i? · review · r2

The editorial reports the empirical cases of Polo et al.'s two case studies, which analyzed argumentation from a linguistic perspective. The editorial states the cases "reveal that emotion can be connected to types of talk", with the quoted associations, and notes many phases resist classification.

"low-intensity emotional framing is usually related to cumulative talk, and disputational talk is often characterized by high-intensity emotional framing; but there are many interactional phases that can ’t be classified according to these types of talk."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Cumulative, disputational, and exploratory talk types together mediated students' enactment of makerspace knowledge practices — related
• Argumentation quality is associated with denser co-occurrence of scientific reasoning and self-regulation processes — related