Emotional valence benefited narrative recall: negative narratives were recalled best and neutral narratives worst (Study 1)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In Study 1 free recall, the negative narrative was recalled significantly better than both the positive and neutral narratives, and the neutral narrative worse than the positive. → Thakore 2024
Evidence¶
Thakore 2024¶
Thakore, K., Das, T., Jahan, S., & Sweller, N. (2024). From Hands to Mind: How Gesture, Emotional Valence, and Individual Differences Impact Narrative Recall. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09948-0
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Study 1 (N = 100) free recall model showed a significant main effect of emotional valence, χ2(2) = 91.33, p < 0.001; pairwise comparisons showed "recall of the positive narrative was significantly worse than the negative narrative" and neutral worst of all.
"Pairwise comparisons showed that recall of the positive narrative was significantly worse than the negative narrative, z = − 2.44, p = 0.01, 95% CI [− 2.12, − 0.23]. The neutral narrative was significantly worse recalled than the negative narrative, z = − 8.87, p < 0.001, 95% CI [− 5.69, − 3.63]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In Study 2, spontaneous gesturing produced better specific recall than instructed gesturing, and negative narratives were recalled better than positive — related
- Instructing adults to gesture while reading narratives aloud hindered free recall relative to spontaneous gesturing (Study 1) — related
- Gesture instructions impaired narrative recall only for participants with average or above-average verbal memory, not those below average (Study 1) — related
- Emotional valence consistently influences narrative recall, with negative narratives most memorable, while instructed gesturing shows mixed effectiveness — a broader claim this one bears on
- Gesture effects on narrative comprehension are not moderated by total task difficulty or age when measured through free recall and specific questions — related
- Producing gestures shows no significant benefit for adult narrative comprehension — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
emotional-valence-benefits-narrative-recall-study1 |
title |
Emotional valence benefited narrative recall: negative narratives were recalled best and neutral narratives worst (Study 1) |
description |
Emotional valence benefited narrative recall: negative narratives were recalled best and neutral narratives worst (Study 1) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — thakore-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.